September 18, 2024

A New Vision for Conservation

I’d like to talk about the history of the environmental movement and how it needs to evolve to address some of the great challenges of our time. Lately, I must admit that I have become concerned about the movement I have been a part of for more than 40 years. It seems to be stuck in the past; oriented more towards stopping things than on designing new solutions.  

A hundred and twenty-five years ago it was a time of tremendous economic expansion; our nation’s vast natural resources were there to be consumed. To build our cities, we clear-cut our forests. To support manufacturing, we extracted minerals and energy without regard to the environmental consequences. And for sport or fashion, we hunted species nearly to extinction.   

Teddy Roosevelt took action, created our first National Forests and Wildlife Refuges and set aside millions of acres of land. His efforts launched the first era of the environmental movement, the Era of Conservation, and today our network of protected lands is the envy of the world.    

By the mid- 20th century, however, we faced a whole new set of environmental challenges. Air quality in some cities was toxic. Rivers were so polluted that some caught fire. And widespread use of chemicals like DDT threatened iconic species, such as the Peregrine Falcon, with extinction. Opposition to this unleashed a tidal wave of grassroots activism and ushered in the second era of the environmental movement. Let’s call this the Era of Regulation.      

There are now more than 10,000 environmental organizations in the U. S. and more than 50,000 pieces of legislation and regulation on the federal, state and local books, including some of the most important laws this country has ever passed — the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act and the Endangered Species Act. 

This era was about stopping bad things from happening. And it worked. Industrial pollution is greatly reduced, the most harmful of chemicals have been taken off the market, and better land use planning has kept development out of the most sensitive areas.     

Yet, these gains have come with a price. Our over-reliance on the tools of legislation, litigation and regulation has now become the environmental movement’s Achilles heel. As a movement, we have perfected the art of saying “No” and have developed almost no capacity to say “Yes.”   

By pitting environmentalism and economic development against each other, there has been more focus on what we can prevent than on what we can do. But so many of the solutions that we need in our country today are the direct impact of a smart, sustainable and economically grounded conservation policy.       

If we are to address climate change and find solutions to other great challenges of our time, then the environmental movement needs a reboot. Conservation cannot be just about saying “No.” It needs to be about saying “Yes.” Conservation is the key that unlocks the future of our country.     

Take the clean energy transition, for example. For 170 years our nation’s energy policy was buried deep underground, fueled by things that happened 250 million years ago. In the future, our energy policy will be driven by what happens on the land, not under it — things like wind and solar and the transmission capacity needed to deliver renewable energy to market.      

It’s a big job. More than a million miles of new transmission lines will have to be built in the next 30 years. Over 65,000 miles of new pipelines to transport carbon dioxide to underground storage sites have to be constructed. Millions of acres of land will need to be dedicated to wind farms and solar fields. The scale of the infrastructure we need to advance the transition to a clean energy economy is mind-boggling, and land conservation is squarely in the middle of it.    

Photo by CGP Grey

At TCF we like to say that “land sustains us.” Land was America’s first natural resource. And because we see the link between land and American progress, we believe that conservation will advance us. What we need now is a new kind of environmentalism, defined not by stopping things but by advancing solutions that work.    

The Conservation Fund does things differently. We work at the intersection of business and the environment, balancing economic progress and conservation. Let’s look at one example that is succeeding.   

For much of the last century, this nation’s large, intact working forests — forests that support the harvesting of trees — were owned by companies to make paper and lumber products. That stable situation was upended about 25 years ago when these large companies began to sell their land into a rapidly expanding real estate market.   

In a short amount of time, more than 90 million acres of land changed hands. It was the largest transfer of private lands in the history of the United States, and 20 million acres was lost to development. Almost none were preserved as working forests.     

The good news was that 70 million acres of large, intact working forests were still large, intact working forests. The bad news was that these assets were held in 10-year funds and at the end of the investment period, the forests were put back on the market with many of the acres sold off for development. As a result, over the next 10 years, another 20 million acres of forest were lost.   

So, American forestland went from 90 million to 70 million to 50 million, and projections are that we will continue to lose about a million acres a year for the next decade. This loss of forests remains the greatest land conservation challenge in the country today. These are the lands that provide us with clean air to breathe, clean water to drink, habitat that supports wildlife and hunting and fishing, and more than 2 million jobs — jobs that cannot be exported overseas.   

Photo by Jerry Monkman

Given TCF’s proven track record of over 4,000 successful land conservation transactions, we decided to do something about this. With the support of the Richard King Mellon Foundation, we designed an entirely new approach to conservation.  

We aggregate a lot of money quickly so that the most important forests can be acquired when they come on the market.  We operate large working forests as economic units, supporting jobs in the woods and in the mills. We ensure the permanent operation of these forests through agreements that prevent fragmentation and allow sustainable harvesting in perpetuity. And finally, we craft an exit from our investments so that we earn back our capital and redeploy it when the next high-conservation-value forest comes on the market.    

We have now deployed more than $1 billion, and in June we announced that we have protected more than 1 million acres of high-conservation-value forests across 21 states. These forests generate more than $830 million in annual economic impact, store more than 250 million metric tons of carbon dioxide, support more than 7,500 jobs and protect more than 2,500 miles of streams.   

This is conservation advancing America — solving for great challenges like the loss of habitat and biodiversity, the protection of safe drinking water and the vitality of rural economies. This is about taking risks and saying YES; focusing not on what conservation can prevent, but what it can “do.”  

We believe this is a framework for the entire environmental movement for the next century. Our challenge to both business and environmentalism is to work together to create long-term, sustainable solutions to our nation’s problems. Business goals and environmental objectives aren’t incompatible, they’re inextricable. Environmentalism without economic progress has no engine. And economic progress that isn’t environmentally sustainable has no future.   

It’s time for us to see that the only way forward is by working together.    

Photo credits (from top of page): Marc Bergreen

Make a Difference

Help protect America's priceless natural landscapes and ensure that we have healthy environments, places to work and play, and real economic opportunity.

Close up of white fungi